Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erlend Krauser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erlend Krauser[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

he played wit james last orchestra (on wich theres a wiki page) but hes not notable?maybe hes not super famous,but hes a great musician with several album and he played in a great band. on top of all i think he deserve more visibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christophersad (talk • contribs) 20:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC) — Christophersad (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unless some sources are cited, we can't consider him notable off-hand. Actually, the correct process for this page would be a BLP PROD.- Andrei (talk) 08:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported Request/Comment: Go slow on this proposed deletion. The article should, in my opinion, be expanded instead. Mobilecreep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobilecreep (talk • contribs) 08:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC) — Mobilecreep (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. Subject of the article is not covered in multiple independent reliable sources. Although it has an article in Romanian Wikipedia but no single reference was present to validate its notability, just like the one we have here (on the english wikipedia). Wikicology (talk) 00:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.